Frequently Asked Questions for soc.genealogy.medieval

Summary:

This regular posting contains a list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) and their answers about medieval genealogy. It should be read by anyone who wishes to post to the soc.genealogy.medieval newsgroup or to the associated mailing list, GEN-MEDIEVAL. The FAQ is currently available on the World Wide Web at http://www.erols.com/wrei/faqs/medieval.html.

If you have any comments or additions or would like to suggest further topics to be included, then please contact William Addams Reitwiesner (wrei@erols.com).

Contributions by:
Pat Boren, Todd A. Farmerie, Bill Lemay, Chris Pitt-Lewis, William Addams Reitwiesner, Josh Stevens, Don Stone

Copyright:

Copyright (c) 1998 by William Addams Reitwiesner. All rights reserved.

This document may be freely redistributed in its entirety without modification provided that this copyright notice is not removed. It may not be sold for profit or incorporated in commercial documents (e.g. published for sale on CD-ROM, floppy disks, books, magazines or other print form) without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Permission is expressly granted for this document to be made available for file transfer from installations offering unrestricted anonymous file transfer on the Internet.

If this document is incorporated in a commercial document, a complimentary copy should be sent to William Addams Reitwiesner (wrei@erols.com).

This document is provided AS IS without any express or implied warranty.


Questions Discussed:

  1. What is soc.genealogy.medieval?
  2. How do I send messages to, subscribe to, unsubscribe from, or search GEN-MEDIEVAL?
  3. Basic newsgroup and mailing list "Netiquette"
  4. Are there on-line sources of information?
  5. How do I start tracing medieval ancestors?
  6. What are the chances that I have royal ancestry?
  7. Can I be descended from Charlemagne or William the Conqueror?
  8. Who were the parents of X?
  9. Can we discuss Biblical lines here?
  10. Why do mythical people pop up here?
  11. Glossary & Common Abbreviations


1. What is soc.genealogy.medieval?

soc.genealogy.medieval is an unmoderated newsgroup for the discussion of genealogy and family history among people researching individuals who lived in medieval times. The primary focus of the group is likely to be on Europe and neighboring regions, but postings about genealogy in other areas during this time period are welcomed.

The mailing list associated with the soc.genealogy.medieval newsgroup is GEN-MEDIEVAL. The newsgroup and mailing list are gated, i.e., all email sent to the mailing list also appears as a posting in the newsgroup, and all postings in the newsgroup (except those that originated with the mailing list) are emailed to the mailing list. See question 2 for information about subscribing to the mailing list.

All who have access to soc.genealogy.medieval or GEN-MEDIEVAL and are interested in genealogy in the medieval period are are welcome to participate.

Scope of the Group

The medieval period is loosely defined for the purposes of this group as the period extending from the breakup of the (Western) Roman Empire until the time public records (such as church, tax, and census records) relating to the general population began to be kept. This period would extend roughly from AD 500 to AD 1600, but these limits are not intended to exclude related topics of discussion lying outside of these boundaries, e.g., royal or noble genealogy in earlier or later time periods. A related newsgroup is alt.talk.royalty., and questions relating solely to royal genealogy after about AD 1600 would probably be better raised there.

The scope of the group reflects the different nature of genealogical research in the medieval period. Vital records and census records are not available for this period, and the researcher must rely instead on records of inheritance of property or tenancy, heraldic visitations, monastic charters, chronicles, onomastic evidence, and even numismatic evidence. The group is intended to address all these various facets.

The group is open to anyone with an interest in genealogy in the time period in question, including, but not limited to:

  • royal and noble descents
  • origins of American colonists
  • feudal descent of property
  • value of pre-historical sources (such as sagas)
  • adoption of surnames and insignia by families
  • source availability and reliability
  • reviews and correction of published works.

Inappropriate Topics and Posts:

  • Postings of a general historical or cultural nature which are completely unrelated to medieval genealogy are not appropriate here. For discussions of a non-genealogical nature, try instead soc.history.medieval or perhaps soc.history.ancient.
  • Advertising or selling of a product or service is not in general regarded as acceptable. The announcement of a product or service and its cost is acceptable.

We highly recommend "lurking"--reading messages without posting anything--for a bit so you can get an idea of how people typically phrase their postings and how to formulate good questions or comments. In other words, "Lurk before you leap."


2. How do I send messages to, subscribe to, unsubscribe from, or search GEN-MEDIEVAL?

  • To send a message to the GEN-MEDIEVAL mailing list, send it to GEN-MEDIEVAL@RootsWeb.com or GEN-MEDIEVAL-L@RootsWeb.com.

  •  

  • To subscribe to (or unsubscribe from) the GEN-MEDIEVAL mailing list, send an email message to the appropriate request address at RootsWeb.com, where the list is hosted using SmartList software.
  • To subscribe to GEN-MEDIEVAL, send the following message:

    To: GEN-MEDIEVAL-L-request@RootsWeb.com
       [if you want individual messages]    OR
    To: GEN-MEDIEVAL-D-request@RootsWeb.com
       [if you want messages in a daily digest]    OR
    To: GEN-MEDIEVAL-NMD-request@RootsWeb.com
       [if you want messages in a non-mime digest]    OR
    To: GEN-MEDIEVAL-I-request@RootsWeb.com
       [if you want only a daily index to messages]
    Subject: [can be blank - it's ignored]
    [Message:] subscribe

    To unsubscribe, send the following message to the appropriate request address:

    [Message:] unsubscribe

    When subscribing or unsubscribing, do not include any additional text or signature.  The SmartList software is picky about .sig lines.
     

  • To change your subscription mode, you have to unsubscribe with the old mode and then resubscribe with the new mode. For example, if you are now getting individual messages and you want instead to get a digest (sent out daily), send the message

  •   unsubscribe
    to GEN-MEDIEVAL-L-request@RootsWeb.com, and then send the message
      subscribe
    to GEN-MEDIEVAL-D-request@RootsWeb.com.

    Similarly, there is no NOMAIL mode. To stop receiving messages from GEN-MEDIEVAL for a while, you must unsubscribe and then later resubscribe.
     

  • To search recent message digests for a specific word, e.g., Llywelyn, send the following message to the digest request address GEN-MEDIEVAL-D-request@RootsWeb.com:

  • Subject: archive
    [Message:] search Llywelyn volume97/*

    This will search all 1997 digests of postings archived at RootsWeb. You will get back a message with items like the following in it:
    volume97/14:18: Re: Llywelyn ap Iorwerth ancestor table
    volume97/14:50:Subject: Re: Llywelyn ap Iorwerth ancestor table, gen. 1-8
    volume97/2:590:> If neither Owain nor Rhodri had descendants....Llywelyn ap Iorwerth
    volume97/2:599:> Llywelyn's daughters, one of whom was Angharad, who marr. Maelgwyn
    volume97/2:602:> claim through his mother Elen, dau. of Thomas ap Llywelyn ap Owain.

    To retrieve the digests containing these messages, send the following to the digest request address GEN-MEDIEVAL-D-request@RootsWeb.com:
    Subject: archive
    [Message:] get volume97/2
               get volume97/14

    Llywelyn appears in lines 18 and 50 of 1997 digest 14 and in lines 590, 599, and 602 of 1997 digest 2.

    Alternatively, you can search and retrieve individual messages.  To search up to 8000 recent individual messages, send the following to the non-digest request address GEN-MEDIEVAL-L-request@RootsWeb.com:
    Subject: archive
    [Message:] search Llywelyn latest/*
     
    To retrieve an individual message, e.g., the one numbered 34, send the following to the non-digest request address GEN-MEDIEVAL-L-request@RootsWeb.com:
    Subject: archive
    [Message:] get latest/34

    Note that searching is case-sensitive.

    More detailed information about searching is available at
      http://www.rootsweb.com/rootsweb/members/archives.html.

    Alternatively, the archives of the mailing list (which is gated with the newsgroup) can be searched at RootsWeb, as described in the following excerpt of a recent message from Brian Leverich:

    ONLINE: THE NEW SEARCH ENGINE SERVER

    The new search engine server is now online and can operate at the speed of a full T1 connection.

    Courtesy of hacks by Karen Isaacson, you can search the archives of any mailing list (except those withdrawn by the listowner), now with nicer *formats* and *updated* to within the last 24 hours, at:

    http://searches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl


3. Basic newsgroup and mailing list "Netiquette"

The netiquette for all newgroups in the soc.genealogy hierarchy is essentially the same. We recommend you read the FAQ Basic Newsgroup and Mailing List "Netiquette" for further details. It is posted periodically to soc.genealogy.medieval.

One important etiquette issue is how to respond to soc.genealogy.medieval or GEN-MEDIEVAL messages.  Before you send off a reply, stop and ask yourself "Who should see this reply?"  If the reply is intended for the poster of the original message only, be sure it is sent just to that person and not to the group or list.

If you are replying to a message from GEN-MEDIEVAL:

  • To respond only to the author of the message, use the simple reply (to author) option.

  •  

  • To respond to the list, use your mailing program's option to reply to the author of a message and all recipients; if your mailing program doesn't have this option, use the simple reply option and CC to GEN-MEDIEVAL@RootsWeb.com.

If you are replying to a message in soc.genealogy.medieval, your newsreader should give you a choice of responding to the author or responding to the group.  If you want to respond to the group and the message has been cross-posted to several groups, remove any irrelevant groups from the Newsgroups: list (and the Followup-To: list, if any); if the message has no genealogical content, remove soc.genealogy.medieval.  Note that very few messages are appropriate for cross-posting.

Unsolicited commercial (junk) email or postings are a problem for which there is currently no ideal solution.  Probably the best strategy at present is to delete and then forget about them; for messages sent to the GEN-MEDIEVAL list, responding to the author(s) and asking to be removed from their list may actually give them a new email address and thus may result in your getting more rather than less junk mail in the future. Some mailing lists deal with junk mail by having a moderated list or accepting messages only from list members.  That is not an option for GEN-MEDIEVAL, since it is gated with the newsgroup soc.genealogy.medieval, i.e., all messages posted to the newsgroup are passed on to the list and all messages sent to the list are posted in the newsgroup.

Other etiquette rules we wish to emphasize or that are unique for medieval posts:

  • Always include a descriptive subject line in your message. Make sure it describes the main point of your message. Remember that many readers use the subject line to decide if they should read your message or not. "Need help" or "Genealogy" are not good subject lines.

  •  

  • Also, if the focus of the discussion has changed from when the thread began, please modify the subject line to indicate this.

  •  

  • Please put *entire* names in UPPERCASE in the Subject line and throughout your message. Many medieval people had no surnames or went by nicknames. Seeing a name like IVAR THE BONELESS in caps helps readers quickly determine which messages are of interest to them.

  •  

  • Please keep the lines of your messages to under 70 characters. Long lines will overflow when quoted by others and become very difficult to read.

  •  

  • Posts may be in any language but will probably be understood by the largest audience if in English.

  •  

  • All posters are encouraged to provide references for genealogical information presented, and to present lineages in as condensed a format as will still convey the necessary information.

One last point to remember concerning inappropriate behavior: our newsgroup, in common with other newsgroups, has its share of people who seek to disrupt the group collectively and/or its posters individually. While we may not have an official policy as to how one should deal with such disruptive behavior, we can suggest the following: DNFTEC. This stands for "Do Not Feed The Energy Creature". An energy creature's favorite feeding tactic is to try to hurt people's feelings or get them angry. The Energy Creature can then feed off the pain and anger it has generated. Its second favorite tactic is to hurt one person or the group's feelings while gathering the sympathy of others. That way, when the injured party lashes back, others will jump to the Energy Creature's defense. The Energy Creature feeds off the attention and the negative energy generated by the people fighting. Newsgroups will never be completely rid of such obnoxious, offensive and ill-mannered beings, but much can be done to keep the situation under control by remembering this simple formula: DNFTEC. If the Energy Creature gets a response, it gets stronger. If it is ignored, it will eventually weaken, wither and go away. Remember: do not to feed the energy creatures.


4. Are there on-line sources of information?

If you are using the World Wide Web (aka WWW, W3, Mosaic, Netscape, Lynx), you can reach several pages related to medieval lineages. We do not vouch for their contents. Their URLs:

Some general genealogical pages have links to medieval compilations such as the above, including:


5. How do I start tracing medieval ancestors?

To trace genealogical connections, step by step, generation by generation, for a thousand years or more is not a trivial task.

For those of you with ancestors in 17th-century America: a quick look for immigrant ancestors with noble or royal ancestry is often the fastest way to acquire a long pedigree. Three books provide a good starting point:

  • Faris, David. Plantagenet Ancestry of Seventeenth- Century Colonists. 1996.
  • Roberts, Gary Boyd. The Royal Descents of 500 Immigrants to the American Colonies or the U.S. 1993. Note the additions and corrections given in NEXUS (NEHGS), May-Aug. 1996, vol. 13, pp. 124-130.
  • Weis/Sheppard/Faris. Ancestral Roots of Certain American Colonists. 1992.

For those of you with ancestors in Britain (from the medieval period up to the present): a good starting point is the set of three indices to pedigrees in printed works and periodicals:

  • Marshall, George W. The Genealogist's Guide. 4th ed. 1903, repr. 1973.
  • Whitmore, John B. A Genealogical Guide: An Index to British Pedigrees in Continuation of Marshall's Genealogist's Guide. 1953.
  • Barrow, Geoffrey B. The Genealogist's Guide: An Index to Printed British Pedigrees and Family Histories, 1950-1975, Being a Supplement to G. W. Marshall's Genealogist's Guide and J. B. Whitmore's Genealogical Guide. 1977.

The books in the first group above and most of the books or articles referenced in the indices in the second group above are *secondary* sources that give the author's opinion of what he found in *primary* sources, which include:

  • Legal primary documents:
    • charters
    • grants
    • patents
    • wills
    • deeds
    • contracts
    • petitions
  • And other primary sources:
    • diaries
    • letters
    • annals of monasteries and abbeys
    • contemporary narratives.

You may want to draw your own conclusions by studying the primary sources first hand, which is recommended because none of these books (nor any other) is error-free.

Primary sources vary in quality, accuracy, and completeness, too. So how can you determine what sources are best/most accurate? By checking recent genealogical publications and discussing it here in soc.genealogy.medieval. The more you learn, the better you'll be able to draw your own conclusions about accuracy and quality of source material.

Prepare for doing the genealogy by reading up on the history, geography, and languages of time and place you intend to research; what you remember (or think you remember) from school is almost certain to be inadequate.

Here are some of the secondary sources which have been cited with some regularity by the participants in soc.genealogy.medieval:

  • Cokayne, George Edward. The Complete Peerage. 2nd ed. 1910-1959 in 14 volumes, reprinted in photoreduced format in 6 volumes in 1987.
  • Europaeische Stammtefeln. ed. Detlev Schwennicke. 1978-1995 in 19 volumes.
  • Stewart, Roderick W. Royalty for Commoners. 2nd ed. 1992, reviewed in The American Genealogist, April 1994.

The soc.genealogy.medieval newsgroup does not have an official position on any source. Individual participants can and do have strong views on the quality of the information presented in these and other sources.


6. What are the chances that I have royal ancestry?

In The Royal Descents of 500 Immigrants, Roberts includes almost 350 colonial American immigrants with royal ancestry. These immigrants (pp. xiv, ff.):

"left sizable, often huge, progenies...These 350 are a large enough group so that living Americans with 50-100 colonial immigrant ancestors in New England (or Long Island), in Quaker (but not German or Scots-Irish) Pennsylvania, or in the Tidewater South (but often not the Piedmont, Shenandoah Valley, or mountainous 'backcountry') can expect to find a royally descended forebear."

Of these 350 immigrants, 167 left ten or more descendants treated in the Dictionary of American Biography. In the New England Historic Genealogical Society newsletter NEXUS, June-September 1994, Roberts says (p. 104) that 100 million is very likely quite a conservative estimate of the number of American descendants of these 167.

[Similar information is needed for other countries. Volunteers?]


7. Can I be descended from Charlemagne or William the Conqueror?

If you are of European ancestry, yes, it is possible. Both Charlemagne and William left progeny--sometimes illegitimate--who have descendants living today.

In medieval Europe, illegitimacy had a more strictly legalistic significance than today, relating to automatic inheritance under either primogeniture or division of legacy. Many illegitimate lines are well known and traced. William the Conqueror himself was known as William the Bastard, not for his personality but for his birth "on the wrong side of the blanket." Note, however, that the majority of descents from medieval English monarchs are legitimate, not illegitimate.

Remember that "descended from" and "able to document a descent from" do not mean the same thing. In the medieval period, most genealogical connections went unrecorded, and in only a certain percentage of cases do the records survive today. So, it is possible that you may be a descendant but unable to prove it.


8. Who were the parents of X?

The soc.genealogy.medieval newsgroup does not have an official position on any lineage. Individual participants can and do have strong views on medieval family lines. Consider this a forum to share and air our views and the conclusions we've each drawn about these ancestries. We want a free flow of information that allows each reader to take responsibility for evaluating the information we share, pursuing the references cited therein if appropriate.

While we all would like definite answers, the fact is that the surviving evidence from the medieval period is sometimes very sketchy, and, in some cases, the evidence is open to a number of incompatible interpretations. The temptation is to consider medieval lineages as verified because they've been around so long. In truth, some authors have made up connections or have made unwarranted assumptions about parentage in an attempt to tie families to royalty or nobility. For this reason, even long-accepted genealogies should not be taken as correct without some investigation.

No genealogy can be "proved," but newsgroup discussion should help you to rate lineages on a scale from very likely to very unlikely.

By all means, if you have anything to add to any discussions, we more than welcome you and your opinions. Don't be intimidated by the on-line experts.


9. Can we discuss Biblical lines here?

This is not the proper forum for discussing the Biblical connections of ancient lines. They are off-topic mostly because they're outside the medieval time period (500 AD to 1600 AD). While mention of the Biblical connections is permissable, discussion should focus on the medieval portions of these lines.


10. Why do mythical and semi-mythical people pop up here?

There are several reasons for this. One is that many pedigrees have been created showing the descent of royalty from important people, including mythical gods and goddesses. Another is the tendency over time to amplify the accomplishments of a real historical person, producing a semi-mythical figure. Maybe Wodin, King Arthur, et al., aren't completely imaginary.

Mythical people will inevitably be discussed here--mainly to help us understand where the myth ends and history begins, but also because myths tell us something about the people that believed in them. Besides, they're fun and spice up medieval genealogy.


11. Glossary & Common Abbreviations

Also see Glossary of Royal/Noble Titles at http://www.heraldica.org/topics/odegard/titlefaq.htm.

Definitions:

royalty
the rulers (princes) and their near families.
nobility
families of high and hereditary rank. Often descended from younger sons of kings. Often the only families which royalty would marry into. In the English system today, the head of a noble family is a duke, marquess, earl, viscount, or baron.
gentry
remaining families of hereditary rank. In the English system, the baronets and the knights (though knighthood is personal and not hereditary).
squire
[British only] a freeman without hereditary title who owns (rural) land, especially the most important free landowner in a district.

Abbreviations:

One of the most common abbreviations in medieval genealogy is "sp", or "s.p.", which stands for either the Latin "sine prole", or the French "sans posterite". Both mean the same thing, "without issue" (that is, without children). With "s.p." as the base, many more abbreviations can be built:

  • d.s.p. == Latin "decessit sine prole" or French "decede/decedee sans posterite", died without issue.
  • o.s.p. == Latin, "obiit sine prole," died without issue.
  • v.p. == Latin, "vita patris," during the life of the father.
  • d.v.p. == "died vp," died before his (or her) father.
  • o.v.p. == "obiit vita patris", died before his (or her) father.
  • v.m. == Latin, "vita matris", during the life of the mother. Usually implies that the mother was an heiress of some sort.
  • o.v.m. == "obiit vita matris", died before his (or her) mother.
  • s.p.l. == "sans posterite legitime", without legitimate issue. Note that "s.p." usually implies "without any issue either legitimate or illegitimate", whereas "s.p.l." usually implies "without legitimate issue but with illegitimate issue".
  • s.p.m. == "sine prole masculina", without any sons. This usually implies "with daughters".

A number of these "s.p." abbreviations can be strung together to provide a fairly precise description of the person's relationships at his or her death, such as:

  • d.s.p.m.l. == died without legitimate sons.
  • d.v.m.s.p. == died during the lifetime of his (or her) mother leaving no children.
  • d.v.p.s.p.m.l. == died during the lifetime of his (or her) father leaving no legitimate sons.

Other abbreviations commonly found in Medieval genealogy include:

  • A.M. == anno mundi (year of the world, according to various dates for Creation)
  • B.C.E. == before common era (long way to write BC)
  • C.E. == common era (politically correct for AD)
  • D.F.A. == Descent from Antiquity (direct descent from person living before AD 476)
  • fl. == floruit (flourished; did his deeds)
  • i.p.m. == "inquisition post mortem," performed when anyone holding land directly under the king (or land under a minor, who held under the king) died. Its purpose was to determine what land was held, who the heir was, and whether that heir was a minor to ensure that the king derived the various benefits available from guardianship. It is useful in providing death dates (sometimes precise, sometimes approximate like older than 21 or 40 years), who was in possession of land at a specific date, who the deceased was holding his land under, and who was holding under the deceased.

Of course the standard abbreviations are used here also, such as:

  • abt. == about
  • aft. == after
  • b. == born
  • bef. == before
  • c. or ca. == circa (about)
  • d. == died
  • dau. == daughter
  • m. == married
  • m1. == married as his first wife (or as her first husband).
  • MS or ms. == manuscript
  • MSS or mss. == manuscripts (note plural)
  • occ. == occurs in sources
  • r. == ruled
  • unk. == unknown


soc.genealogy.medieval FAQ / June 1998 / wrei@erols.com